The Fiscal Matrix

Diversifying Transactional Infrastructure Against Aggregator Compression

Part 4 of “The Bridge | 52 Revenue Acceleration Strategies for Independent Artists” Series

Part 4: The Fiscal Matrix: Diversifying Transactional Infrastructure Against Aggregator Compression

Music Grant Theory 12 Pillars Focus:

• Pillar 1: Stock Offering and DeFi (Bypassing streaming compression through alternative micro-payment systems).

• Pillar 3: Transparency and Security in Transactions (Integrating blockchain and international data/banking compliances).

• Pillar 12: Adaptation and Evolution (Pivoting payment structures quickly to counteract platform fee adjustments).

Securing deep, interactive fan engagement provides the vital baseline data Canadian independent creators need to move past superficial streaming numbers and build diversified, for-profit revenue architectures.  While legacy streaming platforms frequently present financial hurdles and meager payouts for self-releasing acts, the rapid expansion of the independent music scene offers massive commercial opportunities for Canadian independent artists. This article outlines the actionable commercialization and monetization strategies that Canadian independent artists need to bridge their revenue gaps and build truly sustainable, profitable careers. By prioritizing direct-to-fan sales, optimizing physical merchandise pipelines, and exploring innovative funding syndicates, Canadian creators can bypass platform limitations, capture robust revenue streams, and turn their digital presence into a highly profitable enterprise.

💡 “Music Grant Inc. is your direct bridge to commercial capital for music!”

— Music Grant Inc.

Streaming Portfolios and Content-Driven Lead Generation

Cross-platform metrics drive catalog monetization for Canadian indies. Financial data links digital media reach to streaming payouts, showing short-form video drives fan acquisition and revenue [1]-[5].

Applying these commercial strategies to independent monetization requires actionable execution:

• Metric Tracking: Cross-platform analytics act as the primary engine for catalog monetization, helping independent acts turn listener data into reliable income [2, 5] 

• Financial Correlation: Industry tracking proves a direct statistical link between targeted digital media exposure and streaming royalty payouts [4, 5]. 

• Fan Acquisition: Short-form video platforms function as the top mechanism for client acquisition and maximizing gross intake across the Canadian market [3].

Modern diagnostic indicators, such as comment-to-view ratios monitored via the Canadian Independent Music Association, provide Canadian independent artists with highly reliable insights into fan retention and database health rather than vanity follower metrics. Because video networks accelerate consumer transaction velocities, artists must deploy targeted conversion funnels. By directing resources into paid ad placements and visual marketing across Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, acts backed by SOCAN can scale domestic market penetration and maximize net profit margins [6, 7]. 

Data Strategy Breakdown [6]:

• Diagnostic Indicators & Retention: Stop relying on vanity follower metrics. Use comment-to-view engagement ratios via CIMA resources to track true fan retention and database health.

• Consumer Transaction Velocities: Video-sharing networks accelerate how quickly fans buy merch, stream tracks, or purchase concert tickets (such as a local Calgary Showcase). 

• Targeted Conversion Funnels: Build deliberate pathways that move casual scrollers on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube into paying superfans. 

• Monetization & Market Penetration: Reinvest SOCAN Royalties into paid visual marketing and ad placements to scale regional (Canadian) market penetration and boost net profit margins [7].

The Structural Overhaul of Audio Procurement

On-demand streaming platforms have fundamentally overhauled product distribution, shifting Canadian independent artists from physical inventory sales to subscription-based catalog leasing. A macro-economic review tracking the evolution from vinyl and cassettes to digital network dominance by 2026 highlights why algorithmic attention must now be aggressively commercialized for-profit.

Early analysis of legacy compact discs proved their capacity to generate immense net margins, but peer-to-peer file sharing in the early 2000s caused massive capital contraction, forcing the sector into the modern platform economy. This ecosystem relies entirely on algorithmic indexing to monetize consumer attention assets, with SoundCloud and Bandcamp as Alternative Music Platforms offering a glimpse into how networks operate.

This structural shift forces Canadian independent artists—much like the broader ecosystem analyzed in the “2021 Study of the economic impacts of music streaming on the Canadian music industry”—to view their master recordings not as standalone items for sale, but as top-of-funnel lead generators designed to drive traffic into higher-margin commercial verticals [8].

On-demand streaming platforms have fundamentally overhauled product distribution, shifting Canadian independent artists from physical inventory sales to subscription-based catalog leasing [9]. A macro-economic review tracking the evolution from vinyl and cassettes to digital network dominance highlights why algorithmic attention must now be aggressively commercialized for-profit [10].

Early analysis of legacy compact discs proved their capacity to generate immense net margins, but peer-to-peer file sharing in the early 2000s caused massive capital contraction, forcing the sector into the modern platform economy [11]. This ecosystem relies entirely on algorithmic indexing to monetize consumer attention assets, with platforms such as SoundCloud and Bandcamp offering a glimpse into how alternative music networks operate. 

This structural shift forces Canadian independent artists—much like the broader ecosystem analyzed in the 2021 Study of the Economic Impacts of Music Streaming on the Canadian Music Industry by Canadian Heritage—to view their master recordings not as standalone items for sale, but as top-of-funnel lead generators designed to drive traffic into higher-margin commercial verticals [12, 13]. 

Dividend Allocation and Payout Inequities

For-profit commercial streaming networks use subscription pooling and ad-supported distribution frameworks, dividing corporate payouts strictly by total aggregate play volume. Commercial metrics validate this uneven layout, showing that while major corporate-backed catalogs capture large dividend payments, independent Canadian artists receive mere fractions of a cent per play [8], [15]-[17]. Because these systems prioritize centralized mass-market inventory over localized niche product lines, they directly challenge theoretical concepts regarding decentralized market democratization [18]. To insulate your music businesses from this inequitable payment framework, independent acts must bypass mainstream aggregator platforms entirely, securing high-margin cash flows by launching proprietary direct-to-consumer point-of-sale systems, using independent storefront portals, deploying limited-edition product pre-orders, and establishing target-market audio distribution networks [19, 20].

Curated Indexing and Platform Dependence

Digital aggregators function as commercial gatekeepers that control product visibility rather than acting as neutral distribution pipelines [21]. This ongoing platformization compels independent  artists to blindly serve algorithmic recommendation systems, which dictate audience reach via automated playlist indexing [22]. Research highlights that services like Spotify and YouTube serve as structural equivalents to traditional media gatekeepers [23, 24]. Such reliance creates major financial risk; sudden shifts in filter logic can immediately destroy an artist's customer acquisition funnel. To eliminate this structural vulnerability, independent artists must reduce their reliance on third-party curators by migrating assets into owned, direct-to-fan distribution networks. Developing proprietary databases, SMS and text-marketing frameworks, and gated subscriber communities ensures independent artists secure unmediated access to their listener base to maximize long-term enterprise value.

Automated Recommendation Engines and Asset Formatting

The transition to on-demand streaming has completely altered customer discovery pathways, shifting the market away from terrestrial radio or word-of-mouth recommendations toward data-driven automated systems. The interaction between user consumption analytics and audio manufacturing has created strict feedback loops that directly impact product design [25, 26]. Independent artists frequently modify track structures, shortening intros and placing hooks within the first ten seconds to optimize completion metrics and prevent high skip rates that penalize catalog visibility [27] . While these automated curation networks create rapid global distribution pathways for niche styles like K-pop or Lo-Fi, independent artists face intense pressure to standardize their creative output to fit automated criteria [28]. Industry metrics confirm that consumption tracking now dictates product formatting, leading to shorter track lengths and repetitive motifs designed specifically to maximize replay volume [29, 30]. To survive this landscape, independent artists must balance programmatic design with premium positioning, running calculated cross-platform campaigns, creator partnerships, and routine product releases to sustain search relevancy and maximize streaming dividend yields.

Maximizing Gross Profit Margins: Physical Inclusions and Direct Sales

Despite the ubiquity of digital access, target demographics still place a premium valuation on tangible product ownership. Financial audits confirm that consumers derive distinct transactional utility from physical music media, viewing tangible items as premium collector goods that digital access cannot replicate [30]. While digital services attempt to build artificial user attachment via customized playlisting, this digital formatting has actually driven an increased consumer demand for high-value physical goods.  Canadian independent artist should leverage $3.8 billion CD revival [31].  The global compact disc market is projected to soar to $4.7 billion by 2033 (a 2.9% CAGR). For independent Canadian artists, this means premium, tangible merchandise remains a highly lucrative commercial asset to monetize your fanbase and boost revenue [32].

Capitalize on the CD Renaissance.

The physical music comeback is real, driven by dedicated fans and collectors. Here is how you can leverage this market growth:

• Premium Collector's Items: Offer limited-edition pressings, signed inserts, or exclusive bundles directly to your Canadian fanbase using platforms like Bandcamp or Shopify.

• High-Profit Margins: CDs are cheaper to manufacture and ship than vinyl, generating higher direct-to-consumer profit margins at merch tables and online stores.

• Tour Monetization: Maximize your sales per head by offering CDs at live shows across Canada, catering to fans eager for physical keepsakes.

Independent artists can capture these high-margin transactions by launching premium digital download configurations, manufacturing bespoke lifestyle apparel, and distributing limited-run vinyl pressings. This physical product architecture captures high consumer spending and builds a predictable cash-flow engine that protects the business from digital margin dilution.

The Expansion of Sync Licensing in the Independent Sector

Securing sync placements in commercial advertisements, television networks, film productions, and digital gaming platforms represents a premium business-to-business (B2B) revenue stream for independent artists. Current media production trends have triggered a massive surge in demand for non-major, cost-effective audio assets across international networks such as Netflix and global advertising agencies [33]. The rapid scale of digital video distribution has created an urgent commercial need for pre-cleared, contractually clean music assets.

Financial records from international publishing groups confirm that a single corporate sync placement routinely out-earns millions of standard digital streams, delivering instant upfront cash infusions alongside recurring performance royalties [34]. Independent artists can exploit this lucrative commercial sector by building dedicated B2B licensing catalogs, partnering with specialized sync representation agencies, and cultivating direct corporate relationships with music supervisors to fulfill immediate commercial media needs.

Capital Procurement: Crowdfunding and Alternative Corporate Financing

Subscription platforms and reward-based crowdfunding tools have restructured project financing, converting independent artists into corporate operators who manage their own venture capital campaigns [35]. While these digital tools allow independent artists to bypass institutional financing gatekeepers, build direct client relationships, and capture upfront capitalization, they also place the total burden of corporate administrative management on the independent artist.

Music Grant Inc. resolves this operational bottleneck by offering structured alternative financing solutions. By acting as a specialized capital conduit, the company eliminates the administrative stress of campaign management, letting independent artists focus corporate resources on product manufacturing while the organization secures the underlying fiscal runway.

Independent artists running capital campaigns must deploy strict corporate systems to optimize their funding velocity [36]: 

• Prioritize product development by focusing resource allocations on high-tier audio masters. 

• Optimize campaign configurations by setting precise fiscal milestones and high-margin reward tiers for top spenders.

• •Nurture investor relationships through exclusive content delivery and personalized communication. 

• Secure critical management skills or leverage external advisory partners to monitor cash-burn rates.

• Deploy social media channels to document project progress and acquire new capital backers.

Partnering with Music Grant Inc. enables independent artists to streamline daily operations and outsource administrative burdens. By using our corporate funding models, musicians secure non-dilutive capital, exclusive industry resources, and commercial infrastructure. This strategic alliance modernizes traditional funding, giving independent artists a scalable pathway to global market expansion and lasting profitability. 

Alternative Financing Systems: The Music Grant Architecture

Music Grant Inc. operates ‘The Bridge,’ an institutional infrastructure commercialized to connect independent artists with non-repayable corporate funding [37]. We act as the fast-track bridge between an independent artist's vision and the capital needed to realize it, setting us apart from traditional grants or labels. As the music industry undergoes transformations approximately every decade, independent creators need dynamic capital partners to remain profitable (T. Mobley, personal communication, September 9, 2020). By adapting to the changing landscape, Music Grant Inc. effectively addresses the challenges posed by technological disruptions in both music consumption and creation.

Despite broader market volatility, the global music sector continues to show immense economic  potential, for Canadian independent artists, driven by emerging subscription markets, direct superfan monetization models, and premium B2B licensing demands [38]. Built on verified economic deployment models, this framework provides a modern alternative to legacy record label financing or predatory debt structures. Depending on clear, conditional criteria, Music Grant Inc. provides a transparent funding pathway that helps independent artists scale their physical and digital assets while aiming to protect their master recording ownership. By optimizing its financial frameworks for the digital music ecosystem, Music Grant Inc. enables Canadian independent artists to commercialize their catalogs safely [37]. 

The flexibility and adaptability of the music grant business model empowers the music industry and artists to navigate these disruptions, ensuring that creativity and innovation continue to thrive regardless of shifting technological trends (T. Mobley, personal communication, September 11, 2018). Music Grant Inc. enables independent artists to capture this market share by providing cutting-edge financial instruments [38]. Through the securitization of music publishing rights, the execution of adaptable licensing agreements, and the monetization of alternative funding vehicles, independent Canadian creators secure the commercial backing required to scale repeatable business growth and build lasting market equity [39]-[42]. 

Live Monetization: Capital Generation via Experiential Products

In-person performance ticket sales operate as a fundamental revenue driver and a core cash-flow anchor for independent Canadian music artists. Financial data confirms that despite rising digital streaming volume, independent creators cannot sustain their operations on streaming payouts alone, forcing live concert execution to comprise a major pillar of an artist's gross annual income [43, 44]. Within the vast and costly Canadian geographic landscape, live music operations are not a secondary income source; they are a vital business requirement for commercial survival. 

Independent artists must strategically integrate live experiential frameworks, including targeted domestic venue routing, ticketed interactive virtual broadcasts, and corporate educational workshops, alongside public funding portfolios like FACTOR and the Canada Council for the Arts to maximize consumer transaction size, expand regional market share, and build an economic firewall around their creative enterprise.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Canadian music marketplace requires independent artists to maintain constant operational agility and continuous business model innovation to survive. Navigating this hyper-competitive sector demands a permanent commitment to testing new monetization frameworks and diversifying product lines. The direct path to long-term financial sustainability lies in leveraging modern e-commerce technology and building owned, highly monetizable consumer databases to secure repeatable corporate growth.

Key Takeaway for Independent Artists

Embedding a multi-tiered revenue framework that integrates direct-to-fan retail funnels, high-margin merchandise lines, and commercial sync licensing safeguards independent creators against platform distribution bottlenecks and optimizes lifelong intellectual property valuation.

---

Edited by Dr. Tyanne D. Mobley, Grace C.

Commercial Engagement Questions

• Operational Agility: Which low-yield distribution channel or inefficient streaming partner will you drop this quarter to immediately increase your operation’s net profit margins?

• Database Conversion Funnels:  What premium checkout software or high-converting landing page will you launch this month to instantly transform free listeners into high-value paying customers?

• Alternative Asset Horizons:How will you scale your commercial licensing assets—such as high-fee upfront sync catalogs or pre

About this Series 

The “The Bridge | 52 Revenue Acceleration Strategies for Independent Artists” series transforms raw creative passion into a highly scalable, corporate revenue engine. By prioritizing aggressive commercialization within the Canadian and global music markets, this intensive curriculum provides creators with the high-impact monetization frameworks, data-driven systems, and risk-management protocols required to systematically transition from localized, struggling DIY artists into highly successful, profit-driven corporate enterprises.

Read Part 5 |  The Architecture of Ambition: The Art of SMART Goals for Canadian Artists here.

Don't forget to check out the Full Series Index: “The Bridge | 52 Revenue Acceleration Strategies for Independent Artists” series to catch up on missed installments.

Series Navigation

|‍ ‍Part 0 | Part 1‍ ‍| Part 2‍ ‍| Part 3‍ ‍| Part 4 | Part 5‍ ‍| Part 6‍ ‍| Part 7‍ ‍| Part 8‍ ‍| Part 9 | Part 10 |

Ready for the next level?

Complete our Independent Artist Inquiry to bridge the gap between your talent and our premium artist development services.

Scroll Down to the Footer to Subscribe to “The Bridge” newsletter.

Sources

1. IFPI (2026). Global Music Report. https://www.ifpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/GMR2026_SOTI.pdf

2. Tomáš Hromádka. (2025). Marketing Strategy for a Single Release of an Independent Artist Researching and Planning an Effective Digital Marketing Campaign for 2lyn in the Music Streaming Era. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/892730/Hromadka_Tomas.pdf;jsessionid=D61971BC18AD4F01713B5A0FF2CCBEAE?sequence=2

3. Berklee. (2025, May 21). Music Marketing: 5 Practical Strategies for Independent Artists. https://www.berklee.edu/berklee-now/news/music-marketing-strategies

4. Hesmondhalgh, D., Osborne, R., Sun, H., & Barr, K. (2021). Music creators’earning in the digital era. Intellectual Property Office. https://cnm.fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Music-Creators-Earnings-report.pdf

5. Eiriz, V.,  & Letite, P. F. (2017). The digital distribution of music and its impact on the business models of independent musicians. The Service Industries Journal, 37(13/14), 875-895). https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2017.1361935

6. Canadian Independent Music Association (CIMA). (n.d.). CIMA makes music happen. https://www.cimamusic.ca/

7. SOCAN. (n.d.)  Music creators & industry professionals. https://www.socan.com/

8. Government of Canada. Canadian Heritage. (2021, June 2). 2021 study of the economic impact of music streaming on the Canadian music industry. https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/corporate/transparency/open-government/economic-impact-music-streaming.html

9. Southern Utah University. (2021, February 2). The impact of technology on the music industry https://online.suu.edu/degrees/arts-communications/master-music-technology/tech-impact-music-industry/

10. Drott, E. (2024). Streaming music, streaming capital. Duke University Press.

11. Medium. (2023, June 12). The rise of streaming platforms: A revolution in entertainment. https://medium.com/@kasturichatterjee1108/the-rise-of-streaming-platforms-a-revolution-in-entertainment-3553b094d799

12. Durham, B. (2023). Regulating dissemination: A comparative digital ethnography of licensed and unlicensed spheres of music circulation. 

13. Government of Canada. Canadian Heritage.(n.d.).  https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage.html

14. Gantchev, D. (2025). The economic impact of music streaming. Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika 33(1), 106-133  https://doi.org/10.53656/str2025-1s-6-the

15. Benhamou, Y. (2026).  Creative value chains. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781529249514.

16. deWaard, A., Fauteux, B., & Selman B. (2022). Independent Canadian music in the streaming age: The sound from above (critical political economy) and below (ethnography of musicians). Popular Music and Society, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2021.2010028

17. Government of Canada. (n.d.) Canadian artists and content creators economy survey report. https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/copyright-policy-publications/results-survey-artist-content-creators.html

18. Li. F. (2020). The digital transformation of business models in creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 92-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.004

19. Pilati, F., Houssard, A., & Sacco, P. L. (2024). Mirroring in inequalities of mainstream music platforms: Popularity, revenue, and monetization strategies on bandcamp. International Journal of Cultural Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2024.2356169

20. Qu, S., Hesmondhalgh, D.,  & Xiao, J. (2021). Music streaming platforms and self-releasing musicians: the case of china. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1971280

21. Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformisation of cultural production: Theorising the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275-4292. https://doi.org/10.11771461444818769694

22. Eriksson, M., Fleischer, R., Johansson, A., Snickars, P., & Vonderau, P. (2019). Spotify teardown: Inside the black box of streaming music. MIT Press.

23. Raffa, M., & Pronzato, R. (2021).  The algorithmic imaginary of cultural producers. Towards platform-optimized music? H-ermes. Journal of Communication, 19. https://doi.org/10.1285/i22840753n19p293

24. Dharmajaya, M. A., & Swarnawati, A. (2026). Consumer autonomy and algorithmic control: Netflix as a digital broadcasting alternative in the global marketplace. Akselerasi Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional 8(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.54783/jin.v8i1.1528

25. Mokena, N., & Obagbuwa, I. C. (2025). An analysis of artificial intelligence automation in digital music streaming platforms for improving consumer subscription responses: A review. Frontier Artificial Intelligence, 15(7), 1515716. https://doi.org/: 10.3389/frai.2024.1515716 

26. Wei, S. Research on the application of big data analysis in music enterprises. Academic Journal of Business & Management, 5(16), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJBM.2023.051607

27. Matrosova, K. (2024). Modeling and influencing music preferences on streaming platforms. Hal Open Science. https://hal.science/tel-04865002/file/Modeling%20and%20Influencing%20Music%20Preferences%20on%20Streaming%20Platforms.pdf

28. Burkart, P. (2014). Music in the cloud and the digital sublime. Popular Music & Society, 37(4), 393-407. http://doi.org/10.1080/03007766.2013.810853

29. Billboard. (2022, November 10). Songs are getting shorter: Streaming and TikTok are reshaping track length. Billboard [Industry Report].  https://www.billboard.com/pro/songs-getting-shorter-tiktok-streaming/

30. Morris, J. W. (2020). Music platforms and the optimization of culture. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120940691

31. Verified Market Research. (2026, May). Compact disc market size by type (cd-rom, dvd-rom, cd-rw, dvd-ram), by application (music, data storage, software distribution, video, gaming), by distribution channel (offline sales, online sales, direct sales, distributors, retailers), by end user (consumers, commercial, education, healthcare, government), by geographic scope and forecast. https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/

32. Lee, M., Choi, H. S., Cho, D., & Lee, H. (2020). Can digital consumption boost physical consumption? The effect of online music streaming on records sales. Decision Support Systems, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2020.113337

33. Kjus, Y. (2024). The platformization of music production: How digital audio workstations are turned into platforms of labor market relations. New Media & Society, 28(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241304660

34. SoundCloud. (2025). Sync licensing royalties: How artists make money from movies, ads, and TV placement. https://soundcloud.com/topic/category/sync-licensing-royalties

35. Shneor, R., Maehle, N., & Rykkja, A. (2024). What drives crowdfunding intentions of artist-entrepreneurs? – Evidence from Norway. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750324128293

36. Gloaguen, H. (2021). Creating a marketing campaign for an independent musician, Mawunan [Bachelor’s thesis, Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences]. Theseus Repository. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/511155/Gloaguen_Henri.pdf

37. Music Grant Inc. (n.d.). About Us. https://musicgrant.com/music-grant-inc/about-us

38. Mobley, D. J., Jr. (2026). The Music Grant Theory: The Artist is the Nucleus. Music Grant Inc. https://musicgrant.com/blog/independent-artist-morale-nucleus

39. Mobley, D. J., Jr. (2026). Pillar 0: Independent Artist Morale—The Nucleus. Music Grant Inc. https://musicgrant.com/blog/independent-artist-morale-the-nucleus

40. Mobley, D. J., Jr. (2026). Pillar 1: Stock Offering & DeFi — Transforming Royalties into Assets. Music Grant Inc. https://musicgrant.com/blog/independent-artist-stock-offering-defi-royalties-assets

41. Mobley, D. J., Jr. (2026). Pillar 2: Investment Opportunities — Democratizing Access to Music Capital. Music Grant Inc. https://musicgrant.com/blog/independent-artist-investment-opportunities-music-capital

42. Mobley, D. J., Jr. (2026). Pillar 3: Transparency and Security — Building Trust Through Blockchain and ISO Standards. Music Grant Inc. https://musicgrant.com/blog/independent-artist-transparency-security-blockchain-iso

43. Everts, R. (2024). Making it big in live music: A multilevel analysis of careers in live music. Cultural Trends, 33(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2023.2255849

44. Everts, R. (2023). Making a living in live music: Early-career musicians in the changing music industries [Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam].